当前位置:首页>案例中心>Assignment代写案例>Assignment代写范文-热带雨林的过度砍伐

Assignment代写范文-热带雨林的过度砍伐

发布时间:2020-11-13 15:48:57 阅读:54

案例简介

  • 作者:致远教育
  • 导读:下面为大家整理一篇Assignment代写范文,文章讲述热带森林逐渐被人类转变成其他土地资源进行开发使用,这一开发过程是对热带雨林的一种破坏,对当地人们甚至是全球人类的生活都会带来影响。
  • 字数:2423 字
  • 预计阅读时间:8分钟

案例详情

下面为大家整理一篇Assignment代写范文,题目为The overharvesting of tropical rainforests,文章讲述热带森林逐渐被人类转变成其他土地资源进行开发使用,这一开发过程是对热带雨林的一种破坏,对当地人们甚至是全球人类的生活都会带来影响。

热带雨林被过渡砍伐

The unnecessary conversion of tropical forests to other land uses is a damaging process that affects humanity on both a local and global level. This deforestation is defined by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) as "...the long-term reduction of the tree canopy cover below the minimum 10% threshold," and was responsible for the 9.4% degradation in the earth's forest cover between 1990-2000 (FRA 2000, p.24). While some degree of deforestation is an inevitable side-effect of economic development, to degrade forests beyond the optimal rate harms future generations. The vast majority of the damage occurs within the world's three main tropical regions, Africa, Asia and South America, the latter of which is host to 48% of the world's rainforests and 60% of global deforestation (Hansen et al 2009). These figures are concerning for many reasons ranging from the economic and political implications of global warming to the everyday hardships suffered by indigenous forest dwellers.

热带森林不必要地转为其他土地用途是一个破坏性的过程,在地方和全球一级都影响到人类。粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)将这种砍伐森林定义为“……长期减少树冠覆盖率低于最低10%的阈值”,并导致1990-2000年间地球森林覆盖率下降9.4%(FRA 2000,第24页)。虽然某种程度的森林砍伐是经济发展不可避免的副作用,但森林退化超过最佳速度会损害子孙后代。绝大多数的破坏发生在世界三大热带地区,非洲、亚洲和南美洲,后者拥有世界48%的雨林和60%的全球森林砍伐(Hansen等人2009年)。这些数字涉及许多原因,从全球变暖的经济和政治影响到土著森林居民每天所遭受的苦难。

On a micro level, rainforests act as atmospheric quality regulators by absorbing rainwater and releasing water vapour during dry periods. This helps avoid flooding and soil erosion during the stormy seasons and also helps control regional and foreign climates countries, which can also be affected by rainwater from rainforests. According to The Prince's Rainforest Project: “The Amazon releases 20billion tonnes of moisture every day helping to water crops thousands of miles away,” (2009, p.4). Tropical forests are also home to around 50 million indigenous people (Rainforest Foundation, 2009) whose livelihoods depend on both timber and non-timber forest products, such as fruit, oils and medicine. As well as acting as a regulator of groundwater and provider of various products, rainforests also act as a receptacle for CO2 ; deforestation can directly or indirectly increase net global greenhouse gas emissions. (Fearnside & Laurance, 2000). An example of a direct effect of deforestation is the phenomenon of ‘slash and burn' agriculture, the temporary cutting and burning of forest land for shifting cultivation, which creates CO2. Indirect effects depend on the land use, e.g. forestry for cattle ranching or paddy fields will lead to an increase in methane. While it is often the developing countries of the world's tropical regions that suffer the direct externalities of these practices, the cost of climate change is imposed on all countries (Hanley et al, 2001, p.220). Rainforests are also incredibly biodiverse, and are home to some 6 million different species, 99% of which have yet to be studied (The Prince's Rainforest Project, 2009, p.22).

在微观层面上,雨林在干旱期吸收雨水并释放水蒸气,起到大气质量调节器的作用。这有助于避免暴雨季节的洪水和水土流失,也有助于控制地区和外国的气候,这些国家也可能受到雨林雨水的影响。根据王子的雨林项目:“亚马逊每天释放出200亿吨的水分,帮助几千英里以外的作物浇水”(2009年,第4页)。热带森林也是约5000万土著人民的家园(雨林基金会,2009年),他们的生计既依赖木材,也依赖水果、油料和药品等非木材森林产品。雨林不仅是地下水的调节者和各种产品的提供者,同时也是二氧化碳的容器;砍伐森林可以直接或间接地增加全球温室气体的净排放量。(Fearnside&Laurance,2000年)。毁林直接影响的一个例子是“刀耕火种”农业现象,即临时砍伐和焚烧林地,用于转移种植,从而产生二氧化碳。间接影响取决于土地利用,例如,畜牧业或稻田的林业将导致甲烷的增加。虽然经常是世界热带地区的发展中国家受到这些做法的直接外部性的影响,但气候变化的代价是强加给所有国家的(Hanley等人,2001年,第220页)。热带雨林的生物多样性也是令人难以置信的,它们是约600万种不同物种的家园,其中99%尚未被研究(王子雨林项目,2009年,第22页)。

There are many causes of deforestation, which we can split into two categories; proximate and fundamental causes. Proximate causes are the obvious reasons for which forests need to be cleared: logging, non-timber product harvesting, agriculture or for livestock space. Fundamental causes, as observed by Panayotou (1995, p.34) are, imperfections inherent in the market system, including ill-defined or absent property rights, high transaction costs and a failure of the market system to reflect the true value of preservation. A second fundamental cause is the competition for space. For many, rising populations coupled with high poverty rates are key causes of deforestation as governments with growing populations and trade deficits are likely to use forests for revenue rather than explore the benefits of preservation (Perman, 2003, p.616). These economic disincentives to preserve are to blame for the excessive levels of deforestation we are seeing.

While most of the literature points towards wasteful levels of deforestation across the tropical regions, forest conversion can be efficient to an extent. It makes economic sense for a forest to be mined just up until the prices are high enough to rationalize the planting and sustainable management of new forests (Mendelsohn, 1994, p.750). In other words, the optimal rate of forest conversion occurs when the marginal benefits of deforestation (md), for either agriculture or timber harvesting, equal the marginal benefits of preservation (mp). Since the benefits of preservation are unlimited, we must divide by the discount rate, r for (mp/r). The benefits of preservation can then be split into two components, global, (mpG/r) and local benefits (mpL/r).

This is optimality is shown in figure 1 below at the point X*, where the two marginal benefit curves intersect. If global benefits are not accounted for, i.e. without international intervention, the equilibrium is lower down at X**as only the local benefits are taken into account. As with other public goods, there is little incentive for a country to pay a share of the costs when it can enjoy the benefits for free.

The international community must agree to pay the tropical nation a sum equal to or greater than the area abc, which is the tropical nation's loss of benefits (net costs). The area dgef represents the global benefits of preservation enjoyed by other countries. Of course, as with any open access good, a lack of property rights means there is a temptation to reap the benefits of preservation without paying a share of the costs as it would be impossible to stop free-riders from enjoying the benefits. Where there is a problem of free-riders, there is a disincentive for forest-owning nations to bear the costs of preservation when they could quite easily transform forest land into agriculture or infrastructure for revenue. While these profits are immediately visible, forest clearing may not always be the most economically sound solution, as the global benefits of sustainable forestry far outweigh private benefits from harvesting. A study of forest clearing in Malaysia showed that where unsustainable logging techniques were employed, the global benefits from foregone flood protection and non-timber products etc, outweighed private benefits. There was a total economic value loss of around 14% ($1,800/ha) when the forest was unsustainably managed (Kumari, 1994). It is up to the governments of these nations to implement policies which will control the incentives encountered when forests are cleared (Hanley et al, 2001, p.231).

The problem of absent property rights is recognized as one of the main causes of forest degradation and since many tropical forest-owning nations tend to be underdeveloped countries with economies relying on agriculture, this provides further impetus for forest clearance (Barbier, 2001 p.156). These agriculture-intensive economies provide poor farmers with few economic opportunities, forcing them to clear forest land at the margin for subsistence agriculture (Rudel & Roper, p.56). The national debts typical of developing countries coupled with a devaluation in currency will also encourage deforestation as governments will subsidise forest clearing activity in order to increase, now more profitable, exports to steady the trade balance. (Kimsey, 1991). This ‘immiserization' model of deforestation emphasises the importance of population growth and the resulting actions of poor individuals and can be applied to small tropical nations such as the those in Africa, where over half of the deforestation is carried out by impoverished farmers in order to meet their subsistence needs (The Prince's Rainforest Project). But it is not just rising populations and poverty levels that cause deforestation, many macro-agents, such as private investors or governments can determine the rate of deforestation by investing capital to harness a forest's economic potential.

The Environmental Kuznets Curve identifies an inverse u-shaped relationship between GNP/capita and environmental disamenities in developing countries (Koop & Tole, 1996, p.232). In the deforestation case, as GNP/capita increases, deforestation will also increase up until a threshold point, after which, it will fall as GNP continues to increase. Rudel and Roper identified an EKC-type relationship between GNP levels and levels of deforestation as shown in figure 2. Initially at point A, GNP is low and deforestation is due to poor farmers being forced to practice subsistence agriculture. As GNP rises, the curve slopes downwards, indicating a drop in deforestation levels, due to an improvement in economic opportunities for peasant farmers. Between points B and C, the relationship becomes positive, this time as a result of private investment and government subsidies for forest-clearing activity. After point C, GNP continues to rise but we can see a steep downward-sloping in the curve, indicative of a wealthier nation's demand for forest preservation. After the threshold point of GNP as been passed, the country's economy, being less agriculture-intensive, allows poor farmers more labour opportunities in urban areas (Rudel & Roper, 1997, p.61).

There have been a number of measures taken to curb the currently high deforestation rates in developing countries, the most effective of which is the system of debt-for nature swaps. This scheme involves the swapping of a developing country's foreign debt in return for forest preservation on behalf of the creditor. There is increasing pressure on developed countries to seek economically sustainable methods of production and equally increasing pressure on developing countries to repay foreign debts due to rising world interest rates. Debt-swapping agreements allow developed countries to effectively pay for the preservation and sustainable management methods of developing countries. This not only benefits both parties but addresses the problem of missing markets by reflecting the true global value of forest protection. Other policies for tacking deforestation include ecotourism, which gives tourists from the developed world a chance to see preserved rainforests or other protected areas of the natural world. Displaying the preserved land brings in much more revenue than using it for crop plantations (Friends of the earth).

To conclude, policies, be they local or national should seek to minimise the gap between private and social costs of preservation as well as compensating those who lose out on income. The most important factor in rainforest preservation, however, is international cooperation regarding investment, fund transfers and adoption of conservation schemes, without which, rainforests as we know them may be unable to survive and the world may lose out on a thing of great value.

以上就是关于热带雨林被过渡砍伐的Assignment代写范文全部内容,范文内容和格式仅供留学生参考学习,不得抄袭,如有Assignment代写需要,请联系网站客服。同时请认准支援教育官方网站:www.baydue.com